Donations
Main Menu
Home
The Trial
Messages from Michael
Blog
Symphony In The Barn
The Petition
Latest from the farm
Gallery
In The News
Testimonials
Contact Us
Search
FAQs
Links
A Simple Story
Letters From Supporters
Government Contacts
Study On Raw VS. Pasteurized Milk
Glencolton Farms starts its own study on raw versus pasteurized milk.
December 27., 2009.
 
In 1995 I offered the Milkmarketing board, the Ministry of Agriculture and Food and the Ministry of Health our farm as a research farm to explore together the effects of raw milk versus pasteurized milk.

Our first study in 1995 to 2006 was to produce milk safe for human consumption. It included years of baseline testing by an independent researcher for pathogens and also the absence of reported illnesses linked to our raw milk for 20 years.

Our second study  started 4 weeks ago with 2 calves as you see them in the pictures.

Mr. L. Pasteur
Mr. L. Pasteur

Mr. L. Rawkie
Mr. L. Rawkie

They were born almost the same day, they received colostrum for two weeks and then were examined by a licensed veterinarian.

After his examination we changed the feeding to pasteurized homo milk for the one calf, which we call Mr. Pasteur.

The other calf we call Mr. Rawky and is fed only raw milk.

We are working together with some of our chefs in Toronto to also evaluate the meat and do blind tasting in the restaurant.

We will bring here on the Bovine updates on the progress of this feeding trial. We will have monthly evaluation reports written by our licensed veterinarian.

We also will have another research trial starting in January 2010 with 6 pairs of rats. Three pairs will be fed pasteurized milk and the other three raw milk.
This research trial will be a multi- generational trial and we will invite our expert pathologist Dr Ted Beals from Michigan to examine all the animals in respect to organ development and appearance.

Both research trials is under the supervision of Elisa VanderHout B.Sc. (Agr) with the specialty in Animal Science .

Michael Schmidt
 
Remember to come to Newmarket on January 21.2010
Comments (1)Add Comment
...
written by Alex, July 06, 2010
Using only 2 calvs for this "study" is a joke. Real Science is based on representativeness. So you would need at least 20 calvs (10 vs. 10). Furthermore it`s more about the human tolerability of raw milk vs. pasteurized milk. And this would mean a very complex medical study with human "test subjects" over years. Not to forget the effects of raw and pasteurized milk for children vs. adults. Your "study" is just some kind of "marketing gag" for your farm. Let the Universities do the science and let your farm produce milk and stuff.

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
< Prev   Next >