Donations
Main Menu
Home
The Trial
Messages from Michael
Blog
Symphony In The Barn
The Petition
Latest from the farm
Gallery
In The News
Testimonials
Contact Us
Search
FAQs
Links
A Simple Story
Letters From Supporters
Government Contacts
Ontario farmer prosecuted for selling raw milk

Ontario farmer prosecuted for selling raw milk says he will not stop

NEWMARKET, Ont. — An organic dairy farmer from southern Ontario vowed Monday to continue the illegal sale of raw milk, just minutes after being found guilty of contempt of court for ignoring an order to cease selling the product.

"Yes, we will continue with what we're doing," Michael Schmidt said following the ruling, as he and several supporters made a show of chugging back glasses of milk in front of the courthouse in Newmarket, Ont. It was unclear whether or not the milk was raw or pasteurized.

Schmidt has run a co-operative organic dairy farm near Owen Sound, Ont., for more than 20 years. York Region, north of Toronto, had accused Schmidt of selling raw milk, even after he was ordered by the court not to do so.

Selling unpasteurized milk is illegal in Canada because health officials say it can carry salmonella, E. coli and listeria bacteria.

Raw milk advocates say they drink it for its flavour, organic properties and health benefits.

Justice Cary Boswell said his ruling had nothing to do with whether or not people have the right to consume raw milk, but rather whether Schmidt knowingly defied the court order to stop selling it.

The judge cited news articles in which Schmidt admitted he sold the milk and that he knew the consequence of ignoring a court order as the basis for his finding of guilt.

He told Schmidt he should stay within the rule of law in seeking to make the sale of raw milk legal and called his actions "not only illegal, but completely self-defeating."

A defiant Schmidt asked for "the highest penalty you can find," suggesting he is willing to go to jail for his crusade.

Outside court, he went so far as to liken himself to Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr.

"When Gandhi picked up the salt, he kept marching, and when Martin Luther started the Montgomery bus strike, he kept going until the law was changed," Schmidt said.

Schmidt said milk from his animals is regularly tested and that in 14 years no one who has consumed his products have been made sick. He said a recent series of foodborne outbreaks in Canada bolsters the public's desire for natural products.

"They're turned off by mass regulated food supplies," Schmidt said. "They'd rather look at a food source they can trust, and that means looking in the farmer's eye."

Brendan Ferguson, of Toronto, is one of Schmidt's supporters, even though he is lactose intolerant and unable to drink milk at all.

"This is a historic case in terms of the rights and freedoms that the government allows its people to have," he said in explaining his involvement with the farmer's plight.

Schmidt, who defended himself in court to save money for representation at another trial scheduled for next year, had argued that the case against him was flawed.

The judge agreed Monday, noting that local health authorities had the power to test Schmidt's milk to see if was pasteurized or not, but failed to do so.

However, Boswell rejected the prosecution's argument that Schmidt was motivated by making money.

"This pursuit has cost Mr. Schmidt substantially," the judge said.

The prosecution is seeking a $5,000 fine for Schmidt and an order that he pay more than $53,000 in court costs.

In January, Schmidt faces an additional 20 charges laid by the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Grey-Bruce Health Unit, again involving the sale of raw milk.

Comments (4)Add Comment
...
written by Michael Crawford, October 21, 2008
I worked on a farm was I was young fellow and thats all we drank was milk right from the cooler nothing better. If the milk marketing boards had there way there would only be a select few farms left in the country they have ruined the family farm business.
...
written by Peter F., October 30, 2008
It should be a people´s right to choose to buy their food (milk) from a source which they deem reputable, healthy, and safe. As with the Maple Leaf meat scandal I think we can learn big business does not regulate itself well. Small farms, providing small amounts of products to known customers are generally far safer than buying mass produced food. I think the odd case of Mad Cow diseases we have seen over the last few years on huge Canadian feed lots have shown us this. Government and big business lets be reasonable and allow small family producers the right to provide products local customers ask for: RAW MILK. People can take their own educated risks and i would drink RAW MILK from a local known farmer over store bought milk any day of the week!
...
written by Dave, February 11, 2009
I really hate to say this but this is what happens when people give the government the right to run their health care. Think about it. If the government is in charge of our health care, and in charge of "footing the bill", what do you honestly think the provinces are going to do? Not only this but all dairy farms here have a quota, and do you honestly think they would advocate raw milk sold by a non quota dairy farmer? This is just another illustration of the government involving itself in the private sector, and why we must be all the more diligent in keeping and removing the government from the private sector.
...
written by Alli Farrell, April 11, 2009
It's quite astonishing ~ this entire ordeal. But not surprising. If this is the type of treatment that they give a "potentially dangerous" raw milk producer, Maple Leaf should be shut down because of their listeriosis outbreak. On the Canadian Government website, they tell consumers that Salmonella can be found on the following foods:
* eggs and poultry,
* unpasteurized milk,
* raw fruits and vegetables,
* sprouts and nuts.
So - what about organic fruits and vegetables? And Eggs? And what about people who are sprouting at home? Are they going to ban the production of these things as well? Just in case...?? They should raid other establishments as well if this is how it is. The way I see it -- the product is simply unregulated. And so the government can't make any $$ on it. At the end of the day, especially with the government, it's all about the money. So then why don't they just regulate it?? Because! God forbid people actually become healthier! We need children to have asthma and eczema so we can make money off that too. And so they can "legitimately" collect taxes for healthcare... but that's a whole other story.
Hats off to Michael.

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
< Prev   Next >